Skip to content
exa — ten to the eighteenth powerTHE TAX CUTTERY®

Tax & Wealth Advisors · Compliance. Planning. Resolution.

Part III · Resolution — When Things Go Wrong · pp. 375–388

Chapter 20: Expenses, Substantiation, and the Cohan Line

By Paul D. Diaz, EA, MBA · Chapter summary · Updated

As the IRS deploys automated and AI-enhanced enforcement against poorly documented expenses, contemporaneous recordkeeping built into practice workflow is the decisive defense for taxpayers and practitioners alike.

Overview

This chapter addresses the substantiation requirements for ordinary business expenses—the most common source of disputes between taxpayers and the IRS. It traces the doctrine from the Cohan rule, which allowed courts to estimate deductible expenses when exact records were unavailable, through Congress's response imposing strict substantiation requirements under Section 274(d) for travel, meals, entertainment, gifts, and listed property. The chapter explains how these strict rules eliminate judicial estimation for covered categories, meaning taxpayers who fail to maintain adequate records lose the deduction entirely.

The chapter then examines the current and emerging enforcement landscape, including the Automated Underreporter program, the Automated Collection System, and the growing use of artificial intelligence to identify suspicious deduction patterns at scale. It argues that substantiation is not merely a compliance burden but a strategic asset, and it demonstrates how contemporaneous recordkeeping integrated into the Examination File methodology transforms a vulnerable taxpayer position into a defensible one. The chapter concludes that the future of expense enforcement is automated notices with minimal human involvement, making systematic recordkeeping architecture essential for practitioners and their clients.

In This Chapter

Key Terms

Who Needs This Chapter

Tax practitioners and advisors serving small business owners, rental property owners, and self-employed individuals who claim deductible expenses on Schedules C, E, or F and face increasing automated scrutiny of those deductions.

Questions This Chapter Answers

What was the Cohan rule?
Courts could estimate deductible expenses when exact records were missing — judicial mercy for the documented-but-imprecise taxpayer.
What killed Cohan for travel and meals?
Section 274(d): strict substantiation for travel, entertainment, gifts, and listed property. No records, no deduction, no estimation.
What records actually survive an exam?
Contemporaneous ones — built into workflows, dated when made, corroborated by third parties. Reconstructed logs persuade no one.
Cite as: Diaz, Paul D. THE TAX CUTTERY® Guide to Federal Income Taxation, Professional Edition, Chapter 20 (pp. 375–388). taxguide.tax/guide/chapter-20
From the practice: Records that survive exams: Audit triggers for small business

This is the summary. The chapter itself — with the citations, the worked examples, and the full reasoning — is in the book. Read a free excerpt, BUY THE BOOK, or get the free Letter.

← Chapter 19Chapter 21 →